Advantage of Private LessonsIndividual private lessons are simply the most effective method for students to improve their subject knowledge and greatly increase their test scores. (Click to learn more). |
Choosing a Private Tutor How can you ensure you select the right private tutor for you? Luckily, we have put together an easy to read guide to help you make the correct choice. (Click to learn more). |
Rates Click here to learn more about rates, for private lessons, package deals, available discounts, and cancellation policy. (Click to learn more). |
Location & Lesson DetailsClick here to learn more about lesson details including location, duration, timing, and teaching materials. (Click to learn more). |
Standardized Tests Preparing to take a standardized test? With our professional guidance you will be fully prepared and greatly improve your chances of significantly increasing your test scores. (Click to learn more). |
History of Tutors of Oxford The original Tutors of Oxford was co-founded in Hong Kong by Dr. Donnelly in 1993 and soon grew to become the territory's largest and most respected premium quality tutoring service. (Click to learn more) |
![]() |
SHSAT |
|
SHSAT Example Logic questions
|
|
View this page without ANSWERS AND EXPLANATIONS 1. Whenever Derek sings, Jenny gets a headache and Karen groans. If Karen is not groaning, which of the following statements must be true? (A) Derek is singing and Jenny has a headache. ANSWER: E EXPLANATION: We're told that if Derek sings, then Jenny gets a headache and Karen groans. Then we're told that Karen is not groaning. Using the contra positive, we get the following logic: If Jenny doesn't have a headache and/or if Karen isn't groaning, then Derek must not be singing. So if Karen is not groaning, then there is no way that Derek is singing, and choice (E) is our answer. 2. John will eat the apple if Danny does not cook. Based only on the information above, which of the following must be true? (A) John will not eat the apple if Danny cooks. ANSWER: B EXPLANATION: The sentence can be rearranged to read: "If Danny does not cook, then John will eat the apple. Whenever a Logical Reasoning question gives you an "If...then"sentence, the only thing that must be true is called the "contra positive"—take the opposite of each half of the statement, and flip the two halves. Here, the contra positive is "If John did not eat the apple, then Danny did cook." Hence, choice (B) is the right answer. 3. A jury reaches a verdict when all of its members have come to a unanimous agreement. In one recent well-publicized trial, the judge thought that the jury had reached a verdict. Eventually, it was learned that one juror had never been able to agree with the others. The proceeding was ultimately declared a mistrial by the judge. Based only on the information above, which of the following statements is a valid conclusion?(A) The jury never actually reached a verdict. ANSWER: A EXPLANATION: If one juror had never been able to agree with the others, then the members of the jury never came to a unanimous agreement; they never reached a verdict (A). (B) is wrong because it contradicts this idea. (C), (D), and )E) may all be true statements, but we have no way of knowing for sure from the information in the question stem. 4. The maximum time a member is allowed to run on a treadmill at the gym is 30 minutes. Ben has been running on a treadmill for at least 45 minutes. Based only on the information above, which of the following statements is a valid conclusion?(A) The time limit has been established to give every member a chance to run. ANSWER: B EXPLANATION: The trick here is to recognize that the second sentence does NOT say where Ben's treadmill is;it may or may not be at the gym. Only if the treadmill is at the gym is he violating the rules; in other words, if he is not violating the rules, he is not running at the gym (B). (E), the closest wrong answer, is out because Ben could be running at the gym and just flouting the rules. 5. In the 1940's, people diagnosed with disease X were not expected to live beyond six months to a year. Now many people diagnosed with disease X are able to survive for five years and even longer if they receive early treatment. According to the information above, which of the following must be true? (A) Modern medicine is now capable of curing disease X. ANSWER: D EXPLANATION: (D)This Verbal Deduction question revolves around an improvement in medicine. We're told that people diagnosed with disease X lived only six months to a year in the 1940s—whereas nowadays with treatment they can live five years or longer. (D) is the valid conclusion. |
To learn more please select the relevant link below or contact Dr. Donnelly at

